There several main ways to take this story. Whatever one you wish to follow is your choice. After all, this isn't my story, it's yours. Essentially, this story was written in a way so to be so frustratingly vague that the reader has to create his or her own interpretation of it in order to make it a story. However you choose to take it is different than the way another reader would have taken it. Therefore, every time a person reads this story, what they read is entirely different than what every other reader read. 

These are a few interpretations that I had in mind whilst writing: 

1) One: realism. Everything in the story happens, and it is one hell of a tragedy. My forte, to be honest. And pretty clean-cut, isn't it?

-

2) The second way to take it is extremely detail-based.

To begin: look at the point of view style used in the prologue. Compare it to, say, the point of view style used in the epilogue (third-person omnipresent). Now, hold that thought, I'll get there in a moment.

As shown in the epilogue, the entire story referenced both the song Stay With Me and the book The Brothers Karamazov, as if the person creating the story at least subconsciously knew the song and the story. In fact, he or she knew so well the person knew to make the story 25 parts, to correlate with the lines of lyrics to the song.

Details to note: "I delete the recordings right away" and "You can even delete the recording yourself, if you wish" - if the recordings had been deleted right away, how would it be possible to listen to / read them?

Another de