It’s Time to Review Reviews!

Description

So, someone has asked you to review their story. Great! Let’s start the review!

Hold it. Before you begin to review other people’s stories, take the time to review your own reviews (if you’ve done them) and ask yourself: Am I really reviewing the right way? If the answer is “no”, or you’re simply unsure, or maybe you just want some tips and advice on reviewing, then welcome! It’s time to review reviews. Let’s get started, shall we?

Foreword

Too often, I’ve come across reviews that either make me shake my head or, quite literally, “headdesk”. It does get quite difficult to restrain myself from wanting to write reviews for these “reviews”.

It seems to me that, here on AFF, the concept and notion of reviewing isn’t being taken as genuinely as it should. Sure, people argue that 'it’s no big deal' and question the need to 'take it so seriously', but reviewers need to understand that, like your fanfic, a review is also a formal piece of writing.

As soon as you accept the request and call yourself the reviewer, you are being placed in a position where the author of the fanfic has placed their trust in you – they approve of and have faith in your ability as a reader, a writer and a critic. They have placed the fanfic, which they have spent good time and effort (well, we hope they have) nursing and raising into the story they think is presentable to an audience, into your care, hoping you can improve it and give it the extra enhancement it needs. And when it comes to placing their cherished piece of art into the capable hands of someone who is supposed to critique, assess and, well, review, you are expected to do the job “properly”.

And so, what defines “properly”? This, of course, varies from person to person, or, in this case, reviewer to reviewer, and so these tips are simply my point of view and perspective on reviewing. People may disagree with me, and if that’s the case, I’d love to hear your opinions and approaches, too.

 

I am not saying that I am the most amazing reviewer, or that everything I do is “proper”, nor am I implying that I am somewhat superior to all other reviewers out there, but as a reviewer with at least a year’s experience, I have seen the likes of “good” and “bad” reviews, and I’d assume it to be safe to say that I do have an idea of the basics and what should and shouldn’t be done.

These tutorials are not rants; I have written them with the sole purpose of giving advice and tips for those who may have questions in relation to the world of reviewing. The chapters will vary in length, too, depending on the importance of each topic and how much I have to say on them. Some should be pretty self-explanatory, anyway.

Oh, and of course, if you have any questions or things that you want me to cover, feel free to drop them in the comments. Also, if you have anything to add or disagree with anything I have proposed, you’re also more than welcome to let me know and share your opinions, too. :)

 

I do genuinely hope that you all find this helpful in some way!

 


 

Thank you to The Party Scene Graphic Shop for the beautiful poster and background!!! <3

Comments

You must be logged in to comment
stupidfella
#1
Chapter 6: This is so freaking awesome and helpful- <3
Please update soon ;o;
natures
#2
Chapter 6: I really agreed with your (this) story
and it helps me a lot...
Please take care of it and continue ;A;
pxmens
#3
I have a question regarding deducting points: do you think it's right to give zero points just because the reviewer says it plainly ?
Because I once sent a request for a review and I got below 20 points out of 100 just because most of the sections which got graded 'plainly '. The reviewer also said word for word 'your plot maybe is original but it '.
Also is it right to use such words such as , hell, and other which are always used in this century?
Just want to hear your opinion because that one review for my fanfic was stuck in my head which deleted right afterwards.
shawolistic #4
Chapter 6: the section about the title was spot on! There have been numerous times when reviewers have just written "It is too long for a title" and skipped on to the next section not actually paying the sort of attention a title, especially the excessively long and the excessively short ones need. Old comedies and the early new comedies reveled in their long, ridiculous and farcical titles!
contrarily, I have met reviewers who are not fans of one-word titles. if anything, they are pretty anti one-word titles (obviously, not a healthy indulgence either. they believe such titles are too elusive.
Also a lot of author do resort to flowery words when it comes to titles to "grab attention". This practice is something which passively condoned by reviewers, readers and authors. So I really find it difficult to laugh at such titles because technically, they are trying to meet the criteria of a "good and acceptable" title (and failing miserably). I have had several reviewers politely and impolitely point out how a more flamboyant title could have done more justice to the "attractiveness" of a story.
As for symbols and emoticons, I have never seen one on the title of a novel however, we all know that the dynamics of novel writing do not apply to the fanfic world since the fanfic world is freer and more experimental only because of a lack of scrutiny. Having said that, I am intrigued by the prospect of using titles with symbols. Not just abusing symbols to attract more readers or to make a story "prettier" but to genuinely add on to the title. In such case, to establish the normative style of writing titles in such strict boundaries leaves little space for possibilities.
P.S- sorry for indulging in this commenting spree. AFF does have several good workshops some polite, some rude but all of them very informative but I like the fact that yours is so concise. It actually encourages me to finish a chapter and not be intimidated by the length.
shawolistic #5
Chapter 5: I genuinely can't rant enough about reviewers who deduct marks despite the story/section being "absolutely perfect". It has happened to me several times and each time I have avoided asking for a reason because I assumed if they had a reason to deduct my marks they would have mentioned it.
I think some reviewers feel that if they give full marks in sections that they deem important and consequently, allot higher total marks in, renders them as someone who is either very lenient or is not a "serious" reviewers. One of the popular stereotype on this site is that a "serious" stereotype is highly stingy with her marks which is okay as long as there is a justified reason for it. whether there is or not i'll never come to know because as you have mentioned they just do not write it down or even hint towards it!
shawolistic #6
Chapter 2: I am in two minds about this particular issue. While I am in complete agreement with your argument, I do feel that the fanfiction community especially that of AFF is more informal than any other community (for e.g. hpff) This informality persists because of the use of emoticons and abbreviations in reviews. What this sort of approach towards writing reviews does is that it often puts the author at ease. This is to be taken into account because AFF, unlike hpff, where stories are screened by admins and if deemed worthy, are published online, is all inclusive.
Since it is also a place for not-so-good writers to write stories and also get it reviewed maybe it is advisable to keep the reviews informal in such cases (?) Of course, choosing "such" cases questions the criteria of meritocracy on this site which is subject to doubt. however, my point is that if there are certain not-so-respectable transgressions in the realm of "professional reviewing", on this site in particular, then I think some of these transgressions can be forgiven simply because it helps make certain authors feel at ease. To put it simply, one can write a scathing review but mellow the effect a little with some random digressions, farces, abbreviations or emoticons.
Also, and this is just a doubt, if a review is published in an all accessible medium like the internet i.e, the review can't be made any more public than it already is then doesn't it give us the right to copy paste stuff from it as long as we credit the reviewers. We do that with articles, essays, journals, other genuinely professional reviews, then why not with the ones on AFF? :\
KrystalHana #7
Chapter 6: i am so grateful for this chapter! i've always been stuck at how to grade titles. do i grade them at first glance or after i finish the stories and such. but this really helped!
bless this chapter :D
falliblefantasy
#8
Chapter 6: Agreeing with every point up there! I just face-palm every time I see stories with a whole lot of fancy symbols and weird fonts. I mean, it's fine for a shop to have those, but stories? You don't ever see books on shelves that have hearts and stars and fleur-de-lis symbols in their titles ><

Oh and there's another thing. I realised lots of people here like to use titles with foreign languages like Latin. I'm not saying it's a definite no-no, but really, some don't even fit the story's theme/ genre/ 'feel', which makes me wonder if they use those words just to look cool ~
contradictori
#9
Chapter 6: Amen to this.

Another point I'd like to raise though, is the use of overly flowery words. Sometimes I would scroll down an author's fanfics, and it would be chock-full of stories with complicated titles featuring English words even the dictionary doesn't actually realise the existence of. Like, wow people. This is not a vocabulary contest. Make some sense and stop trying too hard to impress people; let your writing speak for you rather than how mindblowingly complicated the title is.
BringingyBaek
#10
As a reviewer who only started reviewing a month ago, I find this tutorial very helpful!
I have a question though: Is it okay if the total marks is over 100?
I made 125 the total marks because I felt like some criteria's needed more attention and I made the total marks for them higher than the rest.