Reel In Your Reader

Korey's K-pop Fanfic-Writing Guide
Please log in to read the full chapter

Your potential reader is a mouse, your story is the mouse trap, and the description is a big fat piece of cheese.

 +  +  = 

Cheese as in, something that looks genuinely worth venturing into the trap for, not something cheesy that makes you cringe.  And if you go into writing the description for your fanfic with that mentality, it's going to be pretty hard for you to go wrong.

 

If you misfire with your title, you have three sentences to convince the browsing reader to click on your story.  Provided you haven't coded in a lot of formatting, in which case you have none.  Make those three sentences count.

 

TL;DR

Avoid: anything that does not relate directly to the plot.  Do not introduce yourself.  Do not pass Go.  Do not collect $200.

Also avoid: spelling and grammar errors; telling your readers that "x is just an ordinary teenager" (they want to know why they should read about your character rather than anybody else's - "hi, I'm ordinary" is unlikely to cut it); giving away the entire plot (especially the - which can be done if you make it too obvious as well as through outright stating it); trying too hard; directing questions to the readers (which they will answer before simply moving on to another story); sycophantic quotes; anything generic enough to be swapped with a different title/characters without people realising they're from two different stories.

Go for: a gripping, punchy first sentence; protagonist, goals, conflict and stakes; the actual story (without spoilers, of course); something that captures the vibe and tone of your story (e.g. a story in the humour tag ought to have a light-hearted or humourous tone).

 

VL;RA/Reasons for the above

For description, read blurb.

You may have noticed that only the first couple of hundred characters of your description get nabbed when it's displayed on the front page.  Your first sentence, therefore, is your most important.  Somebody who skips over your title may get reeled in by your description, so it really needs to pack a punch.  There's no point repeating titles, tags/genres, putting your name or anything like that in the description, particularly at the beginning, because it loses you advertising space for your story.  (Not to mention they're already there anyway.  There's no need to repeat.)

 

Also, if you're thinking about starting your description with "hi, guys!  I'm xxx and I'm back with my new fanfiction"— forget it.  In the nicest possible way, just forget it.  I want my cheese.  If all you're going to show me is the trap, I'm going to be heading in the other direction as fast as possible.  In not using the description to sell your story from the very first letter, you alienate the entirety of your target audience except the ones who already know you and who have already read your stuff, and they probably already know about your story, so if they're not reading it already, they probably won't.  This is shooting yourself in the foot, marketing style... okay, it's shooting yourself in both feet, marketing style, absolutely spectacularly.  If you want people to read your story, you have to pitch correctly to the target audience.  You don't do that by not actually pitching to them.

I mean, that's a rule of thumb about getting anybody to do anything for you, ever. You have to pitch it the right way, at the right time, to the right person.  If you aren't doing all three of those things, then you already have yourself a problem before you've even started.

If you start with anything other than launching straight into an engaging sentence for your description, you are:

1) alienating all the people the tags (and title) would otherwise draw in - people search by tags.  If somebody is in the action tag and sees a description that starts off with Lee Jungmi had grown up hot wiring cars, they're probably going to pick that story over Guess who's back, everybody?  Me!  And this time, I'm writing an action story.

2) silently screaming that you don't think your story can stand on its merits alone - if you have to introduce yourself first and tell people you're a nice person, you're marketing yourself, not your story.  You can be the nicest person alive, or an absolute spoilt brat, but the people surfing through stories are looking for stories, not friends (or brats).

3) not actually giving people a taste for what your story is like.  If you don't know anything at all about a story, it's kind of hard to want to read it.

 

Sure, you'll still get some people reading it whatever you do, but there are hundreds of thousands of readers on this site, and there are also hundreds of thousands of stories, and that means that a lot of people are vying for attention when it comes to their stuff being read.  If you want a large catchment of readers, the best way to get it easily is to stand out.

The blurb, or description, is basically there so that people under the genre (or tag) who have stopped by in that section and looked further than the title can go "oh, hey, this story might be for me" in the space of a couple of seconds.  If you have to click on an extra link (and if you're using data (and that therefore costs money) or, say, in class or somewhere else you shouldn't be on your phone, the last thing you want to do is be clicking extra links – you want to be able to scroll through as soon as possible), it's an irritation.

So, as the author, it's your responsibility to get somebody to click on that hyperlink to take them to your story, rather than overlooking it as they scroll down through the other twenty or so on the page for something that jumps out at them more.  Save all the personal stuff for the foreword, where it's not going to prevent anybody from clicking on your story.

Unless you're using lots of formatting (yes, it looks pretty, but I don't recommend it if you want your description to actually show up), you have about 300-400 characters to make your case for why somebody needs to read your story, and why they need to read it right now.  Because that's exactly what your description should make them feel.  Those 300-400 characters translate to about three sentences.  It's just over the length of the description if you want to advertise something.  Anybody who's put up a bid for an advertisement will know that that's not a lot.  But the thing about a description is that, unlikely the advert, you have more available to you than just three sentences, which means the stress of packing it all into such a small space isn't there.  It might as well be, though, because everything still rests on that first sentence.  But if the first sentence packs a punch, people are likely to follow through and click.

 

How do you write a first sentence that packs a punch, then?  Write a statement about the instigating incident of the plot.  That's all it takes. What is it that kicks the plot off?  (Also, if this doesn't happen within the first five chapters of your story, preferably before, you're doing it wrong.)  Don't write a question.  Don't use a quote.  Don't make it long.

(And yes, I realise that TBBC's description starts off with a quote and a question.  Sometimes, you can break the rules.  You just need to make sure that you're doing it to greater effect than sticking to the rules would.  If you're going to ask a generic question, like "what if you found yourself engaged to somebody you don't know?" or quote "love conquers all", there is literally nothing that makes your story stand out.  And not making your story stand out is a big, big problem, because it means you won't attract as many readers as you should.  I guess TBBC worked because it showed that the situation was unique.  I mean, if I'd started it "would you film a gang lord beating somebody to death in a dark alley?  Because Oh Semi did", I can guarantee that it wouldn't have half the number of readers it does.)

 

When I first put up Rogue, one of the people who commented on it said that the description had drawn her in and that she'd subscribed immediately, having seen it under the tags list, without even being aware that I was the author.  She was a TBBC reader.  That's how powerful a description can be.

This is the first sentence of Rogue's description:

Chaos erupts in Cho Miran's department for the Secret Service on her second day there when notorious enemy spymaster Oh Sehun turns himself in at their local headquarters.

In this one sentence, we have:

1) instigating incident: enemy spy master turns himself in: chaos ensues

2) introduction to the main character, Cho Miran

3) hint of immediate conflict that needs resolution - there's chaos

and 4) the question why the hell did a notorious enemy spymaster turn himself in?

The sentence is probably far too wordy - choas erupts on Cho Miran's second day at the Secret Service when notorious enemy spymaster Oh Sehun turns himself in would probably work just as well, if not better.  You can go overboard as well as underboard.  Also, there's the tone.  The tone of the story quite clearly suggests it's serious, and that there will be intrigue.

 

Compare that to the first sentence from the description for Deer Luhan, With Love:

A case of dyed pink hair, an argument with la madre, and a freak encounter with an EXO member in the park after being hit in the head by a plate find Leigh Lee on a plane to Seoul the next day, with little recollection of how she got there and EXO's maknae intent on calling her hyung.

Here, we have:

1) inciting incident: a case of mistaken identity

2) introduction to the main character, Leigh Lee - who has bright pink hair, argues with her mother, looks like an EXO member, is mistaken for a boy, and has temporary memory loss

3) the tone is overall humorous: there's a case of mistaken identity and the character is presented as quirky

4) conflict: how is this situation going to be resolved?  And also, what's going to happen when people realise she's not a boy, let alone who they think she is?

Again, it's probably too wordy, but it does what it needs to do, and it works.  The entire story is humorous - which is clearly reflected in the first sentence of the description (and if your story's tone and the tone of your description don't match, you're doing it wrong).  The essentials are all laid out.

 

And the last one - and my personal favourite - On Ebb.

Sehun thinks he's got his hands full when his best friend, the princess of Exoplanet, has her memories wiped for the seventh time in an attempt to curb her volatile magical powers.

Here, we have:

1) not quite inciting incident, but something clearly very important to the plot - the princess has volatile magical powers... and no memory

2) introduction to one of the main characters (the other is Chen)

3) the tone is pretty light-hearted, as is Sehun's side of the story with the princess

4) promise of further troubles and conflict: he thinks he's got his hands full with a best friend unable to remember anything with magical powers that could go out of control at any moment, which looks bad enough - but the fact that he thinks that means things are obviously going to get even more out of hand.  Especially since, if this is the seventh time the princess's memories have been wiped, it's obviously not a method that's working very well.  So on top of the other potential problems, what's going to happen when those memories come back?

 

The key here is mixing subtlety with pulling absolutely no punches.  You want it to be compact and engaging, but not to try so hard to engage the reader that you end up putting them off.  If you start with a question, e.g. "what would you do if...

Please log in to read the full chapter
Like this story? Give it an Upvote!
Thank you!

Comments

You must be logged in to comment
seishu
#1
Chapter 6: the beginning is always the hardest part. i read this a couple of years ago for fun, and i was impressed by your knowledge and critical analyzations of first lines. however. i would like to add my own critique as well. granted, i am well aware that this was written and updated a few years ago, but if you ever decide to revamp some of the sections, i hope you take these into consideration.

for the "catch-22" first line(s), i think it is a bit problematic to refer to it as a "curveball" since while it is going for shock value, the shock is supposed to come from the lack of heteronormativity. i think an analyzation of that shocks would be beneficial since it relies on an expectation and subversion. i think explaining the plots (to an extent) as well can help as well since this book is about trying to be discharged from the army to avoid fighting in a war but being caught in the titular catch-22. is this first line equating homouality to a mental illness? or are looking at genuine love? since this book was written in a different time period, and views have changed, i think studying and questioning why we are caught off guard and/or shocked by this first line helps us understand our intrigue. are we interested only because we are shocked? or because we are excited/intrigued by (possible) representation?

the one from "the bell jar" should also have more expansion since the whole point of mentioning the rosenburgs is setting the reader up for a time and place. there really shouldn't be so much intrigue to why they are dead since this is a historical anecdote rather than solely a plot point or metaphor. it tells us that we are a.) probably in the united states and b.) it takes place during the cold war. this first line is a great way to introduce the setting and some minor characterization rather than just an exciting beginning. of course, if you are unaware of american history which is perfectly fine and normal really, the execution of the rosenburgs would be a wtf moment. it gets the job done as you said, but i think elaborating on what i mentioned above is still important since it is more than just intrigue.

as for the original example sentences you gave, while they pique my interest, they all feel the same. i understand you are trying to make them based off a single idea of a character being the new kid at school, the first three especially follow the same pattern of A+B=C. the character (I/Joy/Jinyoung) then some sort of time measurement ("two days etc."/"seven minutes"/"less than half a day") that helps emphasizes a negative aspect of school (detention/general dislike/bullies). your last example doesn't follow the same formula, but it might as well since the vibe is completely the same.

there isn't anything wrong starting off a school story with negativity, but i think giving only one type of atmospheric example fails to show the variety of ways in which you can do it. partly i'm critiquing this is because beginning any type of #schoollife fic with these type of opening lines has already been done and doesn't really offer anything new to the table other than the fact that you doing it with a lot more finesse and technique. the other reason is because i feel when you are only giving examples that are very similar to each other like this, in the atmospheric tone, it limits your ability to show your skills as a writer. it pigeonholes you.

other atmospheric techniques i think that you probably should have discussed would be a beginning that just sets up the setting and world building. kind of like the beginning of "the song of achilles" by madeline miller ("my father was the king and the son of kings.") or "the last unicorn" by peter beagle ("the unicorn lived in a lilac wood, and she lived all alone.") another one that is my personal favorite is dramatic irony. this is stories like "the secret history" by donna tartt ("the snow in the mountains was melting and bunny had been dead for several weeks before we realized the gravity of our situation.") and "everything i never told you" by celeste ng ("lydia is dead. but they don't know this yet.") the latter one directly inspired the first line of a fic i'm working on. i think this is kind of like a nudge-wink to the reader, like hey i'm gonna let you in on a secret that the main characters don't even know about it. it keeps up the suspense you can build around it. or even the beginning of "the stranger" by albert camus is worth talking about since it is what i personally think is one of the pinnacles of immediate characterization ("maman died today. or yesterday, i don't know.")

you isolate the first lines from the body of the story. having an interesting first line is always good, but the way you address it during some of the examples just feels off. for instance, "mortal engines." you're probably going to read the description of the book or fic before you begin reading it. so why are you terribly surprised by how it starts? how else would a book like that start? it's intrigueing, sure. but if you have the premise of the story, why is it so shocking? there needs to be more merging of all the sections since these parts don't function independently. and this is the most recent chapter, and you haven't gone on to make more chapters discussing other topics, but i think there is also a lot of focus on a hook rather than what flows best. so this makes it feel not necessarily less genuine, but you're making anyone taking advice from this rely more on that first line than the rest of the chapter. i think this probably should have been a section in the "opening chapter" listed in your table of contents, but i get why you dedicate a chapter itself to this topic. to me, judging a story by it's first line is like judging a pilot episode by its first scene. having intrigue and shock isn't bad at all, but there is a definite buildup to something that should keep the reader engaged.

if you ever do update this (because who knows - maybe you've moved on to greener pastures), i think having a chapter dedicated to world building and setting would be great since no one ever really discusses that on this site. having a chapter on themes would be great to. like a discussion of how you can make a story impactful enough for the readers to be able to take something away from it. and character development! honestly, probably the most rewarding part of any story.
revolamard #2
Chapter 6: Wow, very helpful because im stuck on how to start my paper ( i have one page to describe an event that happens in 1 minute or less)
revolamard #3
Chapter 2: Im in a creative writing class and this is very helpful to me
rosejardin
#4
Thank you for this helpful guide!
oceanscapes #5
Chapter 6: wow I love this! I come across rant books quite often, which call out authors on their poor-writing skills and/or cliches, but I like how you're actually teaching and helping people with it.
Btw that Jackson opening-line makes me want to write a fic like that xD
Nutellachanyeollah_
#6
I think this is gonna help me. Thanks for the guide!
infinitelyreyaxo
#7
I just remembered this existed lol
Jikuobase-147
#8
Chapter 5: About the italics - I don’t know if you’re a comic book fan, but in comics almost every other word is stressed, but there doesn’t seem to be any particular reason for this. Do you have any idea why?

(P.S. I apologise if you’re not a comic reader because then you will probably have no idea what I’m talking about).